50%+
Action threshold
Dialogue, Not Debate
Normativity pairs people with opposing views, asks both sides to update their confidence honestly, and enforces one core rule: if you are genuinely over 50% sure a moral argument is true, you must act on its implication in real life.
50%+
Action threshold
4x
Match signals ranked
100%
Pledge required to join
Core Mechanism
After each dialogue, each participant reports how confident they are that the discussed claim is true.
If your confidence is 51% or higher, your moral uncertainty no longer excuses inaction.
You must log a concrete action plan and carry it out in ordinary life. The app tracks this in your action ledger.
Pairing Logic
We prioritize people whose confidence moves in the opposite direction of your claim.
Topical overlap (animal welfare, climate, justice, etc.) plus moral-framework diversity creates sharper, more useful dialogue.
Match score is weighted by each counterpart's dialogue reliability so you get disagreement without trolling.
Match score = 0.45 × disagreement + 0.30 × topic fit + 0.15 × framework diversity + 0.10 × reliability
Each component is normalized to 0–100, then combined into a final score out of 100.
Entry Gate
Dialogue Workspace
Studio is locked until the pledge is signed.
Pick one to find a counterpart.
Choose someone who disagrees with your current active conviction.
Publish and select a conviction to generate candidates.
Accountability
Every rule-triggered conviction appears here until marked completed.
Discussion Norms
State your counterpart's strongest case before criticizing it.
Say what changed in your confidence and why, even when uncomfortable.
Confidence reporting is for sincere belief, not social signaling or point-scoring.